Tyre Dispatch - V4C Final Production
Load Ratings and Load Capacity | Tyre Dispatch

Tyre Dispatch · Workshop Data

Load Ratings and Load Capacity

Every tyre carries two numbers defining what it may do: how much weight it can carry, and how fast it can go. Across 1,540 tyres those numbers trade against each other, decide the shape of the tread, predict how the tyre will be mis-inflated - and expose one widely used marking that turns out to mean almost nothing at all.

The load index is a code, not a weight. A tyre marked 94V is telling you two things: index 94, which the ISO table converts to 670 kg per tyre, and V, permitting 240 km/h. Neither is a recommendation. Both are ceilings, and both are structural facts about how the casing was built.

We read those markings off every tyre through the workshop, photograph them, and store them alongside the measured tread. That gives 1,540 records in which the promise a tyre made can be set against what actually became of it.

FINDING 01Load and speed are a trade, and the cheap seat is in the middle

A casing can be built to carry weight or to tolerate heat and speed. Doing both costs money, so most tyres are built for one.

Figure 1 · Median load capacity by speed rating

Speed rating Permitted n Median load index Per tyre
Q 160 km/h 75 117 1,285 kg
R 170 km/h 49 112 1,120 kg
S 180 km/h 101 110 1,060 kg
T 190 km/h 167 110 1,060 kg
H 210 km/h 452 91 615 kg
V 240 km/h 298 92 630 kg
W 270 km/h 308 95 690 kg
Y 300 km/h 80 96 710 kg
Load index converted using the ISO/ETRTO table. Unit: distinct tyres carrying both markings.

Capacity falls by more than half from Q to H - 1,285 kg down to 615 kg - then climbs again through V, W and Y. The curve has a floor, and the floor sits at H.

The low-speed end is light-truck and commercial rubber: heavy casings built to carry and never intended to hurry. The bottom at H is the ordinary passenger tyre - the cheapest useful thing to fit to a family car. Past that, W and Y rubber goes on heavy, fast, expensive vehicles, so capacity has to climb back up to hold a two-tonne performance saloon.

The lowest-capacity tyres in the fleet are not the small ones. They are the ordinary ones - H-rated, 615 kg, the default fitment on the default car.

FINDING 02Ply rating means almost nothing

Plenty of tyres are still sold and discussed by ply rating - 6-ply, 8-ply, 10-ply. The term survives from an era when it counted actual layers of cotton in the casing. It has not described construction for decades, and in this fleet it does not reliably describe capacity either.

Figure 2 · What each ply rating actually carries

6PR
800 – 1,150 kg  n=15
8PR
560 – 1,500 kg  n=58
10PR
1,250 – 1,700 kg  n=54
Bars span the full observed capacity range for each ply rating, scaled 500–1,700 kg. Overlap between adjacent ratings is not marginal; it is most of the range.

Every one of our fifteen 6PR tyres carries more than the weakest 8PR. The lightest 8-ply is rated 560 kg; the lightest 6-ply is 800 kg. A 6-ply tyre out-carrying an 8-ply by 240 kg is not an exception in this data - it is the norm, because the ranges overlap across almost their entire length. The same is true one step up: the strongest 8PR at 1,500 kg beats every 10PR below index 122.

Anyone buying "an 8-ply tyre" expecting a capacity guarantee is buying a word. The load index is the only marking that carries a defined, testable meaning, and it is printed on the same sidewall.

Ply rating is recorded on 130 records - it appears almost exclusively on light-truck and commercial tyres, which is where the term persists in the trade. Those are also, notably, the tyres whose buyers are most likely to be carrying something.

FINDING 03Extra Load has quietly become the default, and it is not about load

An XL or Reinforced marking means the casing is rated to carry more at a given size than its standard equivalent. It sounds like a heavy-duty option. In this fleet it behaves like something else entirely.

Figure 3 · Share of tyres marked XL, by speed rating

Y - 300 km/h
82%
W - 270 km/h
80%
V - 240 km/h
17%
T - 190 km/h
16%
H - 210 km/h
8%
426 of 1,545 records carry an XL or Reinforced marking - 27.6% of the programme.

Eight per cent of H-rated tyres are XL. Eighty per cent of W-rated ones are. The marking tracks which vehicles go fast, not which carry weight - and comparing what the two groups actually hold shows why that matters:

Figure 4 · XL against standard load - what actually differs

Median load index Per tyre Median width Median rim
XL marked 96 710 kg 225 mm R18
Standard load 95 690 kg 215 mm R16
The load difference is one index point - about 20 kg per tyre. The size difference is two rim sizes.

An XL tyre here carries almost exactly what a standard one does - 710 kg against 690 kg. The marking is not buying capacity. It compensates for construction: a short, wide, low-profile sidewall on a big rim has less air volume and less flex, so it needs a reinforced casing simply to reach the rating an ordinary 65-profile manages without one. XL is the price of the wheel fitted to the car, not an upgrade to it.

Figure 5 · Share of tyres marked XL, by manufacturing date

2024 and later
48%
2021 – 2023
28%
2017 – 2020
21%
2012 – 2016
14%
before 2012
10%
Dated by DOT week-and-year code. Median load index across all five eras is flat at 94–96, so this is not the fleet getting heavier.

XL has gone from one tyre in ten to nearly one in two in a little over a decade - while median capacity never moved. Nothing is being asked to carry more. Wheels grew, profiles shrank, and the reinforced casing went from a speciality to the ordinary way of building a tyre for a modern car.

FINDING 04Speed rating decides the shape of the tread

Tread patterns come in three architectures: symmetrical, which is the same across the width and can be rotated anywhere; asymmetrical, with a different pattern inboard and outboard; and directional, which must turn one way. Which one a tyre gets is almost entirely settled by its speed rating.

Figure 6 · Tread architecture by speed rating

Speed rating n Symmetrical Asymmetrical Directional
R - 170 km/h 49 100% 0% 0%
S - 180 km/h 101 98% 2% 0%
T - 190 km/h 167 95% 5% 1%
H - 210 km/h 452 80% 19% 1%
V - 240 km/h 298 59% 33% 7%
W - 270 km/h 308 16% 76% 8%
Y - 300 km/h 80 0% 95% 5%
Records carrying both a speed rating and a classified tread pattern.

The transition is close to perfectly ordered. Not one R-rated tyre in the set is asymmetric. Not one Y-rated tyre is symmetric. Everything in between moves smoothly from one to the other as the permitted speed climbs.

Load rating shows the same pattern - above index 110 the fleet is 95% symmetrical, and above 120 it is 97% - but we checked whether that is really about load, and it mostly is not. Held within a single profile band, load index barely moves the mix until the very top. Aspect ratio is the stronger driver: asymmetric patterns account for 72% of ultra-low-profile tyres, 42% of low, 16% of mid and just 6% of high-profile. Speed rating and profile are describing the same performance fitment; load rating is correlated because heavy-duty tyres happen to be slow-rated.

There is a practical consequence. Symmetrical tread can be rotated to any corner of the vehicle; asymmetric and directional cannot be moved as freely. The fitments most prone to alignment wear - low-profile, high-speed-rated - are also the ones whose rotation options are most restricted, which removes the cheapest available remedy for uneven wear from exactly the tyres that need it most.

Ply rating tells the same story from the commercial end: all 59 of our 8PR tyres are symmetrical, as are 96% of 10PR. Load-carrying tyres are effectively never asymmetric.

FINDING 05Load rating predicts how a tyre will be mis-inflated

Our companion report on inflation found under-inflation dominating passenger cars and over-inflation dominating light trucks. Load index turns out to be the sharpest single predictor of that split in the whole dataset - sharper than construction, width or terrain.

Figure 7 · Wear signature by load index band

Load index Capacity n Under-inflated Over-inflated Alignment
Below 90 under 600 kg 394 34% 7% 12%
90 – 99 600–775 kg 609 28% 12% 15%
100 – 109 800–1,030 kg 254 17% 16% 11%
110 – 119 1,060–1,360 kg 225 22% 31% 15%
120 and above 1,400 kg+ 58 0% 72% 17%
Wear signature read from the tread profile across the width. Genuinely unused tyres are excluded. Percentages are of tyres in that band with an interpretable geometry.

The gradient runs the full length of the scale. In the lowest band under-inflation outruns over-inflation five to one. By the top band it has inverted entirely: not one tyre rated 120 or above showed under-inflation wear, and 72% showed the opposite.

A high load index means a casing designed to be inflated hard because it expects weight. When the vehicle runs empty - as utes, vans and trailers mostly do - that pressure far exceeds what the load needs, the centre of the tread carries everything, and it scrubs out while the shoulders are barely touched.

Above load index 120, under-inflation effectively does not exist. Those tyres have the opposite problem, and they have it three times out of four.

FINDING 06Certification coverage rises with load rating

Figure 8 · Certification marks present, by load index band

Load index n E-mark CCC SNI No mark found
Below 90 394 82% 40% 38% 6.9%
90 – 99 609 87% 50% 45% 3.6%
100 – 109 254 81% 42% 38% 6.7%
110 – 119 225 88% 44% 39% 2.2%
120 and above 58 90% 38% 59% 0.0%
E-mark is European type approval, CCC the Chinese compulsory mark, SNI the Indonesian standard. A tyre may carry several. "No mark found" means the inspector looked and recorded none.

Not one tyre rated 1,400 kg or above lacked a certification mark. Nearly 7% of the lightest ones did. The heavier the tyre, the more likely somebody along the chain has checked it - which is reassuring in one direction and less so in the other, since the unmarked tyres are concentrated at the small, cheap, high-volume end of the market.

One group stands apart: 25 tyres carry CCC and SNI but no E-mark, at a median index of 109 (1,030 kg). That is commercial rubber approved for the Chinese and Indonesian markets and never put through European type approval - legal to sell here, but certified against a different standard than most buyers would assume.

FINDING 07The failure curve peaks in the middle of the range

Figure 9 · Share failing a screening assessment, by load index band

90 – 99  600–775 kg
53%
Below 90  under 600 kg
48%
100 – 109  800–1,030 kg
42%
120+  1,400 kg+
33%
110 – 119  1,060–1,360 kg
27%
Denominator: records in each band carrying an assessment verdict. Verdicts are the workshop's own screening judgement, not a certified warrant inspection.

Ordinary passenger tyres fail most. The 90–99 band - the largest group at 609 records, and the default fitment on the default car - fails at 53%, about twice the 110–119 band at 27%. Part of that is how they are used up:

Figure 10 · Condition at the moment of removal

Load index n Median depth remaining Median lowest point Reached 1.5 mm
Below 90 386 2.85 mm 2.30 mm 24%
90 – 99 599 2.90 mm 2.20 mm 25%
100 – 109 249 3.00 mm 2.50 mm 22%
110 – 119 219 3.30 mm 2.70 mm 13%
120 and above 57 3.40 mm 2.50 mm 23%
"Reached 1.5 mm" counts tyres with at least one measured point at or below the legal minimum.

Only 13% of the 110–119 band reached the legal limit anywhere, against 25% of the 90–99 band. Heavier-rated tyres are more often replaced for some other reason - damage, a set change, a vehicle sale - while ordinary passenger tyres get run until they are finished.

FINDING 08Fast tyres fail more, and fail younger

Figure 11 · Failure rate and age at inspection, by speed rating

Speed rating n Fail rate Median age Median depth
Y - 300 km/h 80 60% 4.5 yrs 3.00 mm
W - 270 km/h 308 58% 4.5 yrs 2.90 mm
R - 170 km/h 49 51% 5.5 yrs 3.00 mm
S - 180 km/h 101 44% 6.5 yrs 3.05 mm
V - 240 km/h 298 44% 5.5 yrs 2.95 mm
H - 210 km/h 452 40% 5.5 yrs 2.90 mm
Q - 160 km/h 75 39% 5.5 yrs 3.70 mm
T - 190 km/h 128 34% 5.5 yrs 3.20 mm
Age derived from the DOT week-and-year code against inspection date.

W and Y-rated tyres fail at 58% and 60% against 34% for T - and they are a full year younger when we see them, at a median 4.5 years against 5.5. They are not failing on age; they are being used up faster. Soft high-grip compounds wear quickly by design, and these tyres sit on the low-profile fitments that carry roughly double the fleet rate of alignment wear.

FINDING 09What the fleet can actually carry

Figure 12 · Rated capacity of a set of four

2,200 – 2,799 kg
34.8%
2,800 – 3,399 kg
17.3%
under 2,200 kg
17.2%
3,400 – 4,399 kg
17.0%
4,400 kg and above
13.7%
Load index converted to kilograms and multiplied by four. Median set capacity is 2,760 kg.

The median set is rated at 2,760 kg. A typical light passenger car has a gross mass around 1,800–2,200 kg, so the ordinary fitment carries a comfortable margin. The tail matters more than the middle: 17.2% of tyres are rated below 2,200 kg across a set, leaving little headroom on a fully loaded small car.

What happens when the rating is exceeded

A load index is a ceiling at the tyre's rated pressure - not at whatever pressure it happens to be running. Drop the pressure and real capacity drops with it, which is why an under-inflated tyre on a loaded car is a materially different proposition from the same tyre on an empty one.

The failure chain is well established and it is thermal rather than mechanical. An overloaded or under-inflated casing flexes further through every revolution than it was designed to; that flexing generates heat; sustained heat degrades the rubber and the bonding between belt and casing; and the separation that follows presents as a sudden blowout rather than a gradual failure. It is most dangerous at open-road speed, when heat accumulates fastest and the consequences of losing a tyre are greatest. The 1,800 kg of apparent headroom in a typical set is not a buffer to be spent. It is the allowance that keeps the tyre inside its rating when the car is full, the boot is loaded, and the pressure has drifted down since anyone last checked it.

FINDING 10Testing the markings against the actual rule

New Zealand's in-service inspection requirements are specific enough to test directly. The VIRM section on tyres and wheels sets conditions on load index, speed rating and marking legibility, and we hold all three for every record.

What the rule requires

  • Reason for rejection 4 - on a light vehicle, tyres must either have matching ply ratings or load indices differing by no more than 2.
  • Reason for rejection 7 - a tyre's speed category must not be below the speed limit for the vehicle, or the vehicle's maximum speed if that is lower.
  • Reason for rejection 9 - tyre information must not be removed or concealed such that the tyre can no longer be identified, including load rating and speed rating.

Figure 13 · The programme measured against the inspection rule

Condition Records tested Flagged Rate
Load indices differing by more than 2 within a set 410 sets 10 2.4%
Mixed speed ratings within a set 410 sets 28 6.8%
Speed rating below the 100 km/h open-road limit 1,540 0 0.0%
Neither load index nor speed rating legible 1,545 5 0.3%
Sets are inferred from consecutive records sharing a size, so some are genuine vehicle sets and some are coincidences of scanning order.

The clean result is the speed rating. Not one tyre in 1,540 was rated below the open-road speed limit - the lowest rating present anywhere in the programme is Q, at 160 km/h. Whatever else is wrong with the fleet, this is not.

The load-index result needs care and we will not overstate it. The rule applies to tyres on the same axle, and we do not record which corner a tyre came from. A set reading 102/102/98/98 is entirely compliant if the matched pairs sit on separate axles - and two of our ten flagged sets look exactly like that. These are candidates for investigation, not confirmed breaches. What can be said is that a spread wide enough to matter appears in roughly one set in forty, and mixed speed ratings in about one in fifteen.

The question this dataset cannot answer

The single most important load-rating rule is one we cannot test: a replacement tyre must meet or exceed the load index the vehicle manufacturer specified. Fitting below it risks sidewall failure, may void both warranty and insurance, and can breach the compatibility requirement in the Land Transport Rule. Checking it requires the vehicle's placard, and we record the tyre rather than the car. Nothing in this report establishes that any tyre was correctly or incorrectly specified for the vehicle it came off. Capturing the placard alongside the tyre would close that gap, and it is the single highest-value addition we could make to this programme.

Other patterns worth recording

Figure 14 · Median load index across other groupings

Grouping n Median load index Per tyre XL share
Manufactured in Taiwan 45 112 1,120 kg 18%
Manufactured in Japan 121 91 615 kg 7%
3PMSF winter marked 67 110 1,060 kg 13%
M+S only 494 98 750 kg 30%
No winter marking 979 94 670 kg 27%
UTQG treadwear below 300 154 95 690 kg 66%
UTQG treadwear 600+ 74 102 850 kg 12%
UTQG temperature grade B 120 110 1,060 kg 29%
UTQG temperature grade A 962 94 670 kg 37%
Groupings overlap heavily. Taiwan, 3PMSF, temperature grade B and the higher load bands are substantially the same light-truck population viewed four ways.

Two of these are worth pulling out. Soft performance compounds carry the highest XL rate in the dataset at 66% - reinforcement is effectively standard equipment on short-life grip rubber. And UTQG temperature grade B tracks load, not heat resistance: grade B tyres sit at a median 1,060 kg against 670 kg for grade A, because grade B is where the commercial casings live. Our inflation report saw grade B behaving differently and correctly declined to call it a temperature effect; this is the reason.

Brand-level differences are large - median load index ranges from 89 to 111 across brands with 25 or more records - but they reflect which market a brand sells into rather than how good its tyres are. A brand supplying four-wheel-drive and commercial fitments will show a high median by definition. We have not published a brand table, because a ranking by load index would be read as a quality ranking and it is not one.

A note on the data itself

The markings check out against the standard

199 records carry both a load index and a separately photographed maximum-load figure from the sidewall, which lets us test the capture against the published ISO/ETRTO table rather than trusting it. 194 of 199 agree to within 5 kg - 97%.

Of the five that disagree, two are the same transcription slip: the load index was typed into the kilogram field, so a 112-rated tyre reads "112 kg" instead of 1,120. Two more read 1,380 kg against an expected 1,400, which is a figure quoted at a different reference pressure rather than an error. One is a genuine mismatch we cannot yet explain. All five are logged for correction; none affects any figure here, which uses the index rather than the transcribed weight.

Six limits worth stating plainly

  • We never weighed a vehicle. Capacity here is what the sidewall permits, not what the car imposes. Nothing establishes that any tyre was overloaded.
  • We never saw the placard. Whether each tyre matched its vehicle's specified rating is outside what we record, and it is the most important question about load ratings.
  • The groupings are not independent. Load index, speed rating, width, profile, construction, winter marking and country describe overlapping populations. Findings 01, 04, 05 and the table above are several views of one split between passenger and load-carrying fitments.
  • Failure rates are our own screening judgement, not certified warrant results, and describe tyres presented for replacement rather than a random sample.
  • Age comes from the DOT code, which dates manufacture, not fitment.
  • Small groups stay small. The 120-and-above band is 58 records, Y-rating 80, ply ratings 130 in total, and Taiwan 45. Their direction is striking; their precision is not.

Two things we expected and did not find. There are no retreads in 1,545 records - routine in a commercial fleet, entirely absent here. And genuinely mismatched fitments are rare: only 8 tyres pair a W or Y speed rating with a load index below 85, all small performance sizes where that combination is normal rather than wrong.

Tyre Dispatch · New Zealand · First edition · 29 July 2026
Descriptive analysis of one workshop's records. Not a representative sample of the national fleet, and not a substitute for a warrant of fitness inspection. Load index and speed rating are maximum ratings at the tyre's specified inflation pressure; the correct pressure and minimum ratings for any vehicle are set by its manufacturer. Inspection requirements summarised from the NZTA Vehicle Inspection Requirements Manual, in-service WoF and CoF, section 10-1 Tyres and wheels. Corrections welcome: email@tyredispatch.co.nz
Page © 2026 Tyre Dispatch NZ · Dataset, measurements and photographs © Taylor Houghton, all rights reserved · Dataset licensing

Tyre Dispatch - Helpful Tools Section
HELPFUL TOOLS

Find Your Tyre

Not sure what size? Our guide helps you find the perfect tyre for your vehicle.

Start Guide

Tyre Size Calculator

Compare up to 4 tyre sizes side-by-side with our visual calculator.

Try Calculator
Checking...

Shop In-Store

Visit us at our Te Puke location for expert tyre advice and same-day fitting.

Get Directions
Auckland

Free Delivery

Free shipping across the North Island (non-rural). Fast, reliable service to your door.

Delivery Info
WOF
✗ FAIL
✓ PASS

WOF Tyre Guide

Learn the 1.5mm minimum and what fails a WOF inspection.

Read Guide
$420
FAST
QUOTE
WINZ Quotes Available

Instant Quote

Tell us what you need and get a competitive quote fast. WINZ quotes available.

Get Quote
How to spot an unregistered EU tyre label

Taylor Houghton

Some tyres sold in New Zealand carry EU energy labels that aren't registered in the European Product Registry. Here's the...

Read more
EV Tyres and Oil Prices: Why Electric Car Owners Are Not Immune

Taylor Houghton

You bought an EV to escape petrol prices. But there is one petroleum cost you did not escape, and it...

Read more
NZ Fuel Prices Surge Past $3. Here's What You Can Actually Control

Taylor Houghton

Petrol is above $3.00/L again and economists warn it could hit $4. You can't control oil markets, but you can...

Read more
Your 5-Star Car Might Brake Worse Than a 1-Star. Here's Why.

Taylor Houghton

Your ANCAP star rating was tested on brand-new premium tyres at full tread depth. Nobody tells you what happens when...

Read more

Join Our Tyre Dispatch Family!

Be the first to know about new collections and exclusive offers.