Your 5-Star Car Might Brake Worse Than a 1-Star. Here's Why.
You bought a 5-star safety rated car. You feel protected. But there's something ANCAP didn't tell you — and it could more than double your emergency braking distance.
When ANCAP (or Euro NCAP) tests your car's braking, they bolt on brand-new, premium tyres at full tread depth. Continental PremiumContact. Michelin Pilot Sport. Bridgestone Potenza. Grade A wet grip. The best rubber money can buy.
That test result becomes part of your star rating. Then you drive off the lot.
The tyres wear. You replace them — maybe with the same brand, maybe not. Maybe you grab whatever's cheapest because the kids need new shoes this month. Nobody recalculates your safety rating. The stars on the sticker stay the same. Your actual braking performance doesn't.
Three Kiwi Drivers. Same Road. Very Different Outcomes.
Let's make this concrete. Three vehicles, all heading south on SH2 through the Kaimai Range. It's raining. A deer steps onto the road at 80 km/h.
Same car. Same road. Same safety rating on the sticker. 32 metres of difference — that's seven car lengths. The gap between stopping before the deer and a collision your airbags have to handle.
This isn't hypothetical. It's what happens when tread depth and tyre quality combine on a wet New Zealand road.
Pick your star rating, set your tyre condition, watch your position drop through the star bands in real time. UBPS v3.7 physics engine, 871 benchmarks, 97.5% accuracy.
Try the Tool →The Numbers Are Worse Than You've Been Told
The most widely cited tread depth data comes from Continental's Contidrom test facility in Germany. They report +27% braking increase at 1.6mm tread. That number gets repeated across the tyre industry. But it only captures one premium tyre under controlled conditions.
We built something more comprehensive. Our UBPS v3.7 physics engine integrates 127+ data points from 18 testing organisations — Continental, Discount Tire, TÜV SÜD, Auto Bild, ACE/GTÜ, VTI Sweden — and validates against 871 real-world braking benchmarks at 97.5% accuracy.
The results are significantly worse than the numbers most people have seen:
The difference matters because Contidrom tests a single premium tyre under lab conditions. UBPS captures real-world variation across multiple tyre types, brands, and testing environments — including the F79 speed amplification effect where worn tyres degrade exponentially faster at highway speeds because water can't evacuate quickly enough.
At 3mm — which most people consider "still fine" — you've already lost over a quarter of your wet grip. At NZ's legal minimum of 1.5mm, you need more than half again the distance to stop.
And that's just tread depth on the same brand of tyre. Now factor in quality.
The 18-Metre Gap the EU Confirms But NZ Ignores
In Europe, every tyre sold must carry a wet grip grade — A through E under EU Regulation 2020/740. It's on the label, right there at the point of sale, next to rolling resistance and noise. The test brakes a vehicle from 80 km/h on a standardised wet surface and compares against a reference tyre.
The European Commission's own published guidance states the difference between grade A and grade E is 18 metres of additional stopping distance from 80 km/h. Our UBPS friction multipliers (A=1.15, B=1.06, C=1.00, D=0.89, E=0.80) produce 18.2m on a wet baseline — matching the EU figure exactly.
In New Zealand? No labelling required. No testing. No disclosure. A tyre that would be labelled grade E in Berlin — with the longest legal wet braking distance — can be sold in Auckland with no performance information whatsoever. The consumer has no way to compare.
Full InvestigationNZ Tyre Regulation Gap — 40+ Country Comparison →
The Crossover Effect — When Stars Lose Their Meaning
Here's the most uncomfortable finding from the tool: a 5-star car on worn budget tyres can genuinely brake worse than a 1-star car on fresh premium rubber.
Think about what that means. A family in a brand-new 5-star Toyota RAV4 who fitted cheap replacement tyres 30,000 km ago could be outbraked by someone driving a 15-year-old 2-star vehicle that just had premium Michelins fitted.
The RAV4's ABS is better. Its brake discs are better. Its AEB system can apply brakes faster than any human. But none of that matters if the four palm-sized contact patches connecting the car to the road can't provide the grip. Every safety system in your car terminates at the tyre.
This isn't ANCAP's fault. They measure vehicle engineering, and they do it exceptionally well. Star ratings are composite scores across crash protection, pedestrian safety, and safety assist — not purely braking thresholds. The problem is consumer understanding. Most buyers assume a star rating is permanent. It's not. It's a snapshot of peak performance under ideal tyre conditions that existed on the day of the test.
What NZ's WoF Doesn't Catch
Your Warrant of Fitness checks tread depth. If you've got 1.5mm across the main grooves, you pass. What it doesn't check — and can't check — is the wet grip grade of your tyres. A tyre with 2mm tread and grade A grip (premium compound, optimised siping) will massively outperform a tyre with 2mm tread and grade E grip (basic compound, minimal engineering).
Both pass WoF. One stops in 55 metres from 80 km/h wet. The other needs 75 metres. The difference is invisible to the inspection process.
Related GuideWoF Tyre Guide — What Inspectors Actually Check →
Our Braking Distance Calculator uses the full UBPS v3.7 engine with 19 factors to show exactly how tread depth, tyre grade, road surface, speed, and vehicle weight all interact. It's the most comprehensive braking calculator available in NZ — and it confirms these numbers.
Four Real Scenarios Every Kiwi Driver Should Run
We built four preset scenarios into the Safety Rating Reality Check tool. Here's what they show for a 5-star car at 80 km/h wet:
The "Typical NZ" scenario is the one that should worry most people. You don't need to be running bald budget rubber to see a significant safety drop. Average tyres at average wear on an average wet day already puts you two star equivalents below what was tested.
What You Can Do About It
1. Check Your Tread Depth Today
Use a 20-cent coin or a proper gauge. If you're at 3mm or below, start shopping now — don't wait for your next WoF. The degradation curve steepens dramatically below 3mm. Our WoF Tyre Guide shows exactly what inspectors check and what they miss.
2. Choose Quality Replacements
The EU confirms 18m difference between grade A and grade E. Even if NZ doesn't require the label, good retailers display it. Ask for the EU wet grip rating before you buy. Premium doesn't mean expensive — many mid-range tyres (grade B–C) perform dramatically better than bottom-tier imports. Browse our range with performance specs on every listing.
3. Replace at 3mm, Not 1.5mm
NZ's legal minimum is 1.5mm. The safety threshold is 3mm. UBPS shows +28% wet braking at 3mm and +52% at 1.5mm. That 1.5mm of additional wear buys you almost nothing in tyre life but costs you enormously in wet grip. Use our Tyre Size Calculator to find the right replacement size.
4. Check Pressure Monthly
Under-inflated tyres increase braking distance, accelerate uneven wear, and reduce fuel economy. Use our Tyre Pressure Calculator for the manufacturer-recommended PSI. Check when tyres are cold, before driving.
5. Scan What You've Got
Not sure what's on your car right now? Point your phone at the sidewall with our AI Tyre Scanner — it reads the size, brand, and DOT code and tells you everything about what you're running.
The Safety Rating Reality Check shows exactly where your tyres put you on the ANCAP braking scale. Adjust tread depth, tyre grade, and conditions in real time.
Check Your Rating →The Bigger Picture — NZ's Regulatory Gap
This blog and the tool behind it are part of a larger investigation we've been running. New Zealand has no mandatory tyre certification, no wet grip testing, and no consumer labelling — the weakest tyre safety framework of any developed nation across the 40+ countries we've researched.
When we compared NZ to the EU, US, Japan, Australia, and dozens of other markets, we found that NZ sits alone in having none of the five standard tyre safety pillars: pre-market certification, consumer labelling, minimum performance standards, mandatory recall powers, and post-market surveillance.
Meanwhile, NZ road deaths are up 35% since 2013 while the OECD average improved by 19%.
Companion Blog PostWe Compared 40+ Countries' Tyre Safety Laws. NZ Ranked Dead Last. → Full Investigation
NZ Tyre Regulation Gap Guide — The Complete Evidence →
Your star rating matters. But only if the tyres match the promise. Check yours today.